Response to concerns of elder abuse
PDF 110 KB
Printable elder abuse resource for workers and professionals to respond to sitations where elder abuse is a concern
Workers and professionals may often be the first to suspect or have concerns about an older person, their carer, relative or friend, and are encouraged to develop an awareness of the following:
This will largely depend on the service role of the organisation in relation to older people. Not all workers will be responsible for responding to suspected, alleged or reported cases of elder abuse. However, it is important for workers to be aware of information that can help determine the next steps that should be taken if there are concerns about safety and wellbeing.
Workers have a responsibility to uphold the rights of a person and prevent carelessness, neglect or harm to another person, in a professional relationship between people where there exists a responsibility or obligation of care.
More information about Duty of Care (PDF 110KB).
Decision-making capacity refers to a person’s ability to make day-to-day decisions about legal, medical, financial and personal matters.
Read more about:
Older people have the right to self-determination, autonomy and to have their decisions respected and implemented. Older people are presumed to have capacity to make decisions, unless determined otherwise. Their decisions must be respected and upheld. A person is still entitled, even with a diagnosis of mental incapacity, to have their wishes taken into consideration.
Consent is when someone accepts or agrees to something that somebody else proposes. For consent to be valid, the consenting person should:
The law requires that a person has decision-making capacity (legal capacity) when making certain decisions in their life, in order for them to be considered valid.
For further information about when an assessment about a person’s decision-making capacity may be required read: What is Decision-Making Capacity (PDF 127KB).
Mental capacity assessments are usually conducted by trained health care professionals and some allied health professionals.
Freedom of choice relates to decisions about life choices including accommodation, lifestyle, health care, and management of property and finances. It also extends to accepting or refusing help that is offered, and whether or not a person chooses to take action related to concerns of elder abuse.
Undue influence or coercion is when in situations of power imbalances, an individual who is stronger or more powerful manipulates the other individual to do something they would not have done otherwise. This may include isolation, creating dependency, or inducing fear and distrust of others.
Where there is concern of undue influence or coercion, impaired decision-making capacity is suspected, there may be a need for legal intervention such as through an application to the South Australian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (SACAT).
While workers are not responsible for assessing undue influence, decision-making capacity, or evidence of financial abuse, they may have a responsibility to seek advice if there is a need to determine whether the person’s decision-making capacity is impaired. They may suspect:
If you are not sure or if you have concerns, contact the Office of the Public Advocate; or the SACAT.
The University of Adelaide, supported by Office for Ageing Well and in collaboration with the Aged Rights Advocacy Service (ARAS) and older South Australians, has developed an Elder Abuse Simulation e-Guide to help increase awareness of elder abuse in the community.
A valuable resource for front-line staff, the e-Guide includes information on how to recognise the often subtle signs of elder abuse; how to approach this with sensitivity with someone who is potentially experiencing elder abuse; and how to respond.
Please take our short survey about the Stop Elder Abuse web pages.